Author:SeleneDePackh,
Artist,Writer,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Usa
Artist,Writer,Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Usa
"Where the Rain Gets In"
I spent a weekend this spring trying to find out whether
an online friend had taken his own life. Christopher commented constantly across
the fragile fellowship of the autistic spectrum on the web. He and I shared a
fondness for surrealist art; he’d often leave a knowledgeable comment comparing
a new artist I’d found to another from an earlier generation. I knew his mood
from the given comics character he had as his icon—Marvel monster/heroes with
bulging muscles alternated with sweet-faced manga animals. He’d started using
one I hadn’t seen before, a wistful white manga lion looking off into some
undefined horizon.
He’d expressed occasional loneliness, remarking on a
funny Valentine’s Day post showing a conjoined carrot resembling an embracing
couple that everyone had someone but him. When a favorite artist of ours died,
I posted an obituary. My friend was unaware of his death, and said he’d been
struggling so hard with work that he’d lost touch with what was important. It’s
uncommon for those of us on the autistic spectrum to have success in both
employment and relationships; neither of us was an exception to the odds. About
a third of us are able to live independently. Christopher, in his fifties as I
am, had managed to hold a steady high-tech job and lived alone but for a much-loved
cat. I have a long-term, supportive relationship, but I haven’t been able to
navigate the working world on its own terms for any length of time.
Friday morning there had been Christopher’s regular
stream of political postings. His commentary was sardonically funny, as it
often is. I keep my feed running in the corner of my screen as I work on my 3D
artwork or write. When I’m doing my housewife chores, I check my tabs every
half-hour or so. One of my online comrades will often be struggling, and the
rest of us swarm in to offer support like dolphins raising a newborn calf to
the surface for its first breath.
Christopher had posted a pained rejoinder to a recent
article in The Daily Beast by Maia
Szalavitz. It was called “A Radical New
Autism Theory” and touted the stunning results from a new study suggesting that
people with autism spectrum disorders “might be more able to experience empathy
than originally supposed.” The issue of empathy (or lack thereof) is a sore
point in my community, as are many of the dehumanizing attitudes of the
neurotypical world. The most recent sting was from the killing of George Hodgins,
a 22-year-old autistic man, by his mother Elizabeth, who then committed
suicide. All sympathy was for the pathologically troubled mother; the young man’s
name was rarely mentioned in news coverage; he was “her autistic son,” with no other
identity worthy of public remembrance. The victim was non-verbal and exhibited
the signature behaviors of autism—the lack of eye contact, the flailing
gestures, the agitated rocking and meltdowns from intrusive stimuli.
As we with the distinctive brain connections of autism realize, most non-verbals among us understand
language perfectly well, and are capable of other forms of communication. Some
coverage of this, such as by Ariane Zurcher of The Huffington Post, is
finally making its way into the mainstream, but agonizingly slowly. My original
support network arose partly in response to a 2006 video called ‘Autism
Everyday,’ created by the largest “autism advocacy” group, Autism Speaks, for
fundraising; it was widely distributed and never publicly retracted. After protests,
the video no longer appears on the Autism Speaks website, but the group has
never acknowledged the hurt it’s caused. It shows a mother speaking of wanting
to kill her non-verbal daughter because caring for her is so burdensome… as the
daughter plays in the background. There was every probability the child
understood everything her mother was saying.
My informal circle found one another through our pained
reactions to Autism Speaks and its allies calling for ways to “cure” us of our “disease,”
oblivious to the fact that it’s a vital part of our brain structure,
inseparable from ourselves. The programs they support are biased toward the elimination
of autism, and thus by extrapolation, the elimination of autistic people. Never
mind that we’re well represented among the greatest intellects in history. There’s
no positive message that we’re known for loyalty and honesty, that we have
great powers of analysis and concentration. Their material presents dire
predictions of burden, dissolution and financial ruin for our families. It’s a
testament to our resilience that we don’t have higher rates of depression and
suicide than we do, given what we hear about ourselves. Autism Speaks has no
autistic members on their board of directors, and only a few token autistics in
advisory positions, yet they dominate the public conversation on autism and
control the majority of funding. One member of my circle coined the phrase:
“Autism doesn’t speak unless autistics are speaking,”
My group was excited because a local television station
had covered their candlelight vigil for the young man who had been murdered. It’s
unusual for us to be heard in the public conversation on our lives at all. An autistic
activist who could “pass” in the neurotypical world spoke of the hurt our
community feels for the disposability of his life. She executed the correct
movements, keeping her large dark eyes raised—not looking away, staring or
moving her hands inappropriately. Then another activist was interviewed, a
woman with a notable academic record who writes with passionate clarity. Her
anger and stress had overridden her self-restraint; she looked away from the
reporter and waved her hands erratically, her hair disheveled. She raged
against the mother, saying that all parenting is hard and caretakers should
just “get over it.” Ironically, she isn’t autistic; there was no mention of
that. The news story ended with that image.
Sometimes it feels like it’s been a thousand-year
monsoon over this leaky outpost of ours, yet we still rush to the window every
time there’s a hint of a break in the clouds. I congratulated the group, but
said I regretted the impression left by the news story’s parting quote. The
woman who had made that impression came online and apologized for having lost control of her talking
points, none of which were
included in the final edit.
Christopher posted an article about the then two-week-old
killing in Florida
of an unarmed black teenager by a “block watch captain” who had yet to be
charged with any crime, along with an especially bitter comment. It was less
than he generally says in a day, but I didn’t think about that at the time. I
fixed dinner and spent the evening with my partner. I didn’t check my social
media before bed. We took a lazy Saturday morning, and then I went to see what
was happening with my circles. There was a single line status update from
Christopher, written late at night in his time zone. He rarely leaves them,
preferring to comment when he shares something from someone else.
“I am so tired of being a fundamentally
broken human being; I wish I could fall asleep and never wake up.”
The dolphins had gathered in the meantime; a dozen or so
of his friends had left encouraging messages. Uncharacteristically, there was
no response from him. I wrote: “You are valued here. We can’t afford to lose
any members of this odd fellowship.”
My note was followed throughout the day with more from
other friends, increasingly anxious. Christopher had private messages relayed
to his phone; I left one for him. I posted on my page, asking if anyone had
heard from him. I got only echoes of my own worries. I checked every half hour
or so; nothing more appeared but the lengthening thread of concern. I left a
post on the networking page that serves as a hub for a lot of social
media-connected autistic adults. In the time it stayed visible before new posts
pushed it out of view, no one responded. I gave up for the night, and shut the
computer down.
Christopher’s despondence is a baseline for a lot of us
on the spectrum. We know we live in the fragile margins of life, even as many
of us appear outwardly successful. We’ve always been here: the eccentric
hermit, the ostracized collector of books or stray animals, the strange one no
one wants to sit next to on the bus. An English study from 2007, updated in
2011, found that “adults with ASD living in the community are socially
disadvantaged and tend to be unrecognized.” A goodly proportion of us who can
“pass” in social settings carry the awareness that we’re one meltdown away from
the street or an institution; it’s an ache so familiar it usually goes
unnoticed.
Over the previous month, just before Christopher
disappeared from the radar screen, I’d been a
research subject in a University of Pittsburgh/Carnegie Mellon study to assess
how “high-functioning” autistic brains are different from “lower functioning”
ones. I’d had misgivings about volunteering, particularly since Autism Speaks
was partially funding it. I’d refused to give a blood sample for DNA profiling;
I didn’t want to contribute to a eugenics determinant. It will be found, but
not with the genetic markers from my body. The world
would be a poorer place if autism were eliminated through pre-natal testing,
whether it chooses to know it or not. I don’t intend to assist the process.
I wanted to give my younger peers the benefit of my
successful behavioral adaptations without the pain I went through to develop
them; I also wanted to know first-hand how the conclusions which would come
from the study were reached. Research shows that autistic brains start out very
similar to one another, with fundamental differences in neurological connection
patterns from typical ones. Differences in autistic social functioning seem to
arise in significant part from changes in the brain that develop from differing
patterns of use. I was a sample of a more successful adaptation; my
neurological connections would be mapped using a functional MRI to determine
how I’d learned to meet situations challenging to an autistically wired brain.
I’d been through several interviews to determine whether
I fit the profile. I proved to fall deeper in the autistic category than I’d
thought. The autism spectrum begins with a total diagnostic assessment score of
13; full autism begins at 19. My score was 22. I’d been asked about markers of
the condition in my initial phone interview: did I have low muscle tone, an
awkward gait, slumping posture as an adolescent; uncoordinated motor skills;
unusually poor performance in team sports; was I bullied in school; had I had
complaints about my dress or personal hygiene, particularly as a child; complaints
about not respecting conventions of conversation; did I have hypersensitivity
to particular tactile sensations, sounds, lights and odors; unusual insensitivity
to certain types of pain; was I prone to digestive upsets, allergies,
migraines, visual disturbances? Yes to all.
The intake screening interview was videotaped for
educational purposes. I was representing my peers; I tried to carry myself with
grace and dignity. When the assessment report from the study office came in the
mail a week later, my stomach knotted. The interviewer’s statement described me
in the third person; I read my name with the same dissociated sense I’d had as
a child looking at my report cards.
“…Selene primarily used complex speech…she produced
stereotypical words and phrases accompanied by a slightly odd intonation of her
voice…her emphatic gestures were slightly excessive.
“…She had difficulty asking her conversational partner
about her thoughts, feelings, and experiences and even responding in a
reciprocal fashion to her comments. Therefore, the conversation lacked the
level of reciprocity expected for an individual with her language….
“Selene inconsistently directed her gaze and facial
expressions to her conversational partner…. When speaking, she tended to look
down…[she] had a difficult time modulating her eye contact with her speech and
gestures…difficulty describing how she feels when she is happy, sad, angry or
anxious…. She demonstrated some insight into her own behavior and its effect on
social interactions. Selene had some difficulty understanding social
relationships such as friendship and her role in the relationship.
“Overall…Selene’s social overtures were somewhat awkward…
[she] engaged in some reciprocal social communication…but this was less than
would be expected.
“…Selene made reference to highly specific and detailed
topics…. She did not exhibit any unusual repetitive hand movements, nor did she
engage in any self-injurious behavior....”
That was the best I could do—with a half-century’s worth
of learned protective camouflage—using the top 99th percentile IQ
another assessment done the same day showed. I’d been unable to keep my train
of thought without looking down. I demonstrated some insight into how weird I
seem, and I didn’t rock myself or pick at my hands, even though I felt the urge
so deeply that I pinched myself under the table a few times. I was still
considered a successful enough specimen to be included in the brain-scanned
group. I thought about that, deep into Saturday night.
That night, thinking of the markers in my blood I’d
refused to reveal, I let myself wonder if a lot of us might have been better
off never having been born. Autistic kids have a sign on their backs that’s a
target for tormentors of all persuasions. We don’t really lose it when we leave
school— it just gradually gets better hidden for some of us, even if it takes
all the energy we have to keep it tucked deep inside. We don’t read subtle
neurotypical social cues well, so most of us have a hard time developing and
keeping friendships, and knowing which people will take advantage of us. I
think the most common effect we feel is the stress exhaustion of trying to seem
“normal” while staying hypervigilant about our vulnerabilities.
Sunday morning brought nothing from Christopher. I
debated with myself, and then dug into the information on his page and found a
contact for one family member, a brother. I followed the link. There were no
pictures of my friend in the copious family album I found on his page. I copied
Christopher’s brother his last post. I wondered what results from my study
participation might have changed things for a little boy learning how to battle
through life with a widdershins—not fundamentally broken—mind.
I re-read my assessment, remembering the conversation in
front of the video camera.
“What makes you happy?”
“Working on my art…doing my gardening…being with people
I care about….”
“What did you like to do when you were a child?”
“My father brought me home a set of ballbearings…. I
know it’s an autism stereotype, but when I’d spin them, over and over…. I was
listening to the music of the spheres, learning about the workings of the
universe…not mindless….”
“What makes you angry?”
“Cruelty—be it deliberate, ignorant or indifferent.”
“What are you afraid of?”
“Fists.”
“What does sad feel like?”
“Like my heart is a clod of clay…or if it’s that sadness
that’s gentle more than grieving…the lighter one is like rain against the
window….”
I didn’t have difficulty describing how I feel; that is
how I feel. It may not be how I am expected to feel, but it’s the truth, purely
told.
By Sunday night, I’d resigned myself that at best,
Christopher was hospitalized somewhere. I hadn’t got an answer back from his
family. The clay was heavy in my chest, the muffled thuds pulling me down into
a dark, dull place.
Mid-day Monday, though, a personal message came through
in response to the one I’d left on Christopher’s phone. It just said “still
here. Thanks for your care and concern. Will be posting a thanks to all
shortly.” He was true to his word, leaving a terse but grateful note on his own
page, and tracking down and publicly answering all my posts scattered across
the network.
“The water got deep, but my nose is still just above it.
Still very depressed, but holding on. Thanks again to all for your kindness. It
helps to know I have such caring friends. ”
I wrote to tell his brother I’d heard from him. I
finally got a response: “Yeah, he’s a great guy. I worry about him.”
I thanked him for getting back to me.
Later in the week I watched a little girl with her shirt
crooked walking stiff-legged through Target, reading her book without watching
where she was going, her pink sparkled feather boa unwound from her neck and dragging
behind her, unraveling.
The next day I saw an older girl in the grocery store, soft-bodied,
with a calm face and poor posture, flicking her beads around her wrist—winding/unwinding—
singing the same strangely sweet note over and over as shoppers avoided her,
glaring. I walked past, back and forth getting yogurt. Her tired-looking father
studied the refrigerated shelves far longer than politeness allows; he seemed
to be trying to read an extinct language carved in a rock. He ignored me as I
reached in past him into the cold. The girl never flicked me with her beads,
even though I got quite close. I trusted her.
That night the rain ran down the glass, catching a glint
from the streetlight….
PS : Selene De Packh is a BPPROJECT contributor and she offers her articles to BPP for free and for the shake of our audience only.
Her brilliant Illustrations found above, created especially for this article.
If you want to learn more about Selene De Packh, please visit:
ALL CONTENT © ISMINI KARALI 2011 - 2012. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
No comments:
Post a Comment